Colour management is one of those topics that can confuse you very quickly. Every photographer will eventually stumble across issues with mismatched colours, and you will find that colour management is something you have to get good at. Unless you do only Black & White photography, in this case you can skip this article. Nice meeting you, come back soon for the other exciting topics I will cover on this website!
Hi fellow colour enthusiasts! If you are reading this, you do at least some colour photography, welcome to a rollercoaster ride!
What do I mean with colour management?
In ‘simple’ terms, it is the art of capturing a coloured subject with a digital camera and being able to reproduce the same colour
- on your monitor or in a projected imaged
- in your favourite post-processing application
- on a chosen paper with a specific ink and printer combination
- on your favourite computer and operating system
- in a specific viewing environment with a specific lighting condition
TLDR; You want to reliably print (or display on a screen) an image of a scene and the colour rendition should be consistently true to the actual colour of the scene. That’s what I mean with colour management.
And as easy as it sounds, it is incredibly hard to achieve out-of-the-box.
So many devices, so many colours are displayed incorrectly
The whole process has a lot of transition points where the used device has a different idea of how a colour should look like. Strange, isn’t it?
Camera, computer, and monitor
It starts with the camera. Different brands reproduce colours differently, they have a certain ‘style’. When you move the image to the computer in a certain file format that can restrict the number of colours included in the file. Your computer then interprets the file and decides how to display that on a screen or projector. Most screens are not capable of displaying all colours that can be seen by the human eye. And the colours they can display are normally not displayed in the same way, they differ also from brand to brand and depending on how good the monitor is calibrated (that is a term we will use a lot later on: calibration!). Other factors might be how old the monitor is and what displaying technology it uses. The monitor also fools around with brightness, that messes things up a lot.
Printing
When it comes to printing, it gets even more complicated and exponentially increases the combination of things that have to work together. The way you perceive colours from prints is fundamentally different – you see now reflected light. The prints do not emit the light as a monitor does. We also have to deal again with different brands, printing technologies, inks, papers, and lighting conditions when viewing the printed result.
Are you still with me? Great, I see, you are dedicated to embarking on a journey that will give you satisfying prints with less tries. Or just an image on the screen that looks the same (~ish) on all calibrated monitors. It will not be perfect, but a lot less frustrating.
Why do we want a colour-managed workflow?
Do dive deeper into that, we first need to get one thing out of the way: calibration.
Calibration
And what does that even mean: calibration?
When we calibrate things, we measure something and compare it to a given standard, and then we try to make the measured thing behave as close to the standard as we can.
When we calibrate a monitor, we have a standard, e.g. pure ‘Red’ should be emitted with a wavelength of 700nm. We can use devices (see below) that can measure the output of a monitor when displaying a pure Red image. If it doesn’t display it with 700nm, we can correct the system so that is correctly displays Red. Or Green. You get the idea.
The ‘System’ is the computer with the operating system (mostly Windows, iOS, or Linux) together with the attached screen/monitor. We can create correction instruction for the system how it should display colours on a specific output device – a specific monitor or projector. When you use a display calibration device (e.g. X‑Rite ColourMunki – that is now sold by Calibrite -> ‘ColourChecker Display’) , or one of the ‘Spider’ products of Datacolor ) it can create a correction instruction file (for windows computers: an ICM file or ICC) for the specific combination of computer and monitor/projector. If you attach a different monitor to the computer, you will have to calibrate that, too.
Some more expensive monitors have inbuilt hardware calibration that can be executed from time to time as monitors age. They are generally better than software calibration. For the differences between software and hardware calibration, you can read this good article from BenQ: Hardware vs. Software Calibration | BenQ US
Why bother using a colour managed workflow?
Photography Competitions
In photographic competitions the judges normally have a calibrated screen (they should have). If you don’t use a calibrated monitor, then the image on your screen will differ potentially a lot from what the judge sees when evaluating your image. A cheaper uncalibrated monitor in the consumer market displays images a lot brighter and bluer than a calibrated monitor. If you post-process images on a non-calibrated monitor and they look good to you, the judge will see them a lot darker and with more yellow. In other words: the judge evaluates not the same representation of the image you wanted him/her to see. That can quickly lead to disappointing evaluations and missed awards (if you are into that kind of thing). This is also a two-way street. If you have a calibrated monitor, and the judge does not, then the same thing happens – frustration about the same image being displayed differently. We don’t want that.
I’m still surprised how many members in the photo club I know do not use a calibrated monitor. The equipment to calibrate your monitor is not overly expensive, and the process to do the calibration is also quite easy and quick. Well, if you don’t calibrate your monitor, you are just setting yourself up for random results. As soon as your post-processed file leaves your computer for printing or to be displayed on another computer and screen, you are at the mercy of equipment you don’t control. If you are ok with that randomness, then I guess you can stop reading here as well.
Commercial Photography
In commercial photography it is paramount that you work with a calibrated monitor. The reasons are the same as above: other people will only see the same image with the same colours you intend them to see if both parties have a calibrated monitor. That can be the difference between a satisfied customer or unpaid bills. With commercial photography. e.g. product photography, it is also very important that the product is rendered with correct colours.
You also have to be very careful with the light colour temperature of the lighting equipment (how warm/red or cold/blue the light is), or you need to colour correct the images afterwards if you don’t have enough control over the lighting. That is another topic we will dive into: how to correct a colour cast in the image if the lighting was not neutral (daylight – about 6500Kelvin). That is different from calibration, but you need that also to display correct colours in a way. We will come to that in a later article.
Show off to Friends & Family
Even when you ‘only’ put your images on your social media account or show them to your family and friends, as soon as your processed file leaves your computer, you lose control. You have the best chance that people look at the same colour rendition if you use a calibrated monitor. You want people to look at the same dark blue sky you experienced in the twilight, right?
Your audience deserves to see the same colours as you see on your screen. As much as possible. I know, it is not easy, but we will discover together what we can do to get it as correct as we can and want.
Outlook
I will cover each sub-topic in a separate article, and I will update the link list below as I complete the series.
Have fun creating colour-corrected images that display well on your calibrated screen and impress with true-to-live colours on your prints!
- [placeholder for link to part 2 of the series]